to Stanford and Berkeley. . . .
In the past two weeks Lily and I have taken
campus tours at Stanford University and at the University of California at Berkeley
(or Cal). Perhaps it’s unfair or unhelpful
to compare a private and a public university, but as Lily is still in the stage
of gathering impressions, I thought I’d note a few observations we made about
the two schools before our memories are cluttered with several more campus
visits we plan to make in the Boston area in late March.
Stanford and Berkeley actually have a lot
in common (besides the Axe that they pass back and forth between Big
Games). Both are located in sunny, mild
northern California; they share library resources and attract a diverse and
fairly liberal student body. Both have
very selective admissions based on high GPAs and test scores, impressive extra
curricular activities, and well written application essays. Both offer a large selection of majors,
undergraduate research opportunities, study abroad programs, Division One and
club sports programs, financial aid. . .the list goes on.
But they also differ in important
ways. Lily’s cousin Ruth, a Stanford
senior, stresses the flexibility in Stanford’s academic program, which has
allowed her to double major in Human Biology and French as well as study
overseas in both Paris and Oxford. In contrast, Alice, our tour guide at
Berkeley and a senior Medieval History major, stressed how Cal wants all
students to graduate in four years, implying more limited options to explore
other courses or programs. Also,
Stanford is on a quarter system, which allows students even more choice through
more courses but also results in a pretty intense and pressured schedule. Cal is on semesters like most other public
universities and many liberal arts schools.
Another difference is atmosphere. Ruth
remarked that Stanford doesn’t really have access to a college town as Palo
Alto isn’t very student oriented. Berkeley,
unlike Palo Alto, is a quintessential college town with plenty of student
hangouts, shops, tie-dye, and other more questionable paraphernalia.
The main difference overall I believe is
SIZE. UC Berkeley has over 25,000
undergraduate students while Stanford’s undergraduate population is more like
6,000. The sheer number of students
affects everything else: academics and extra-curricular opportunities. Alice showed us the largest lecture hall at
Berkeley—it holds 750 students! She was
quick to assure us that few courses are this large but many of her freshman and
sophomore introductory classes enrolled at least a few hundred students with
breakout weekly discussion sections led by graduate students. Stanford has large introductory lecture
courses as well, but all freshmen have at least two seminar sized classes and
the possibility of taking several more “intro sems” as they’re called, special
topic seminars reserved primarily for freshmen and sophomores.
Stanford’s undergraduate research
opportunities are also more plentiful and better funded than those at Cal, but
Cal does offer research in every one of its many departments, Alice assured
us. Berkeley’s large size also means even
more diversity in both student body and in majors and programs offered.
Overall comparing trees and bears seems a
lot like comparing apples and oranges—two different kinds of fruit—it depends
on one’s preferences which tastes better.
I’m a Stanford alum, so naturally, I must be biased toward my alma
mater; nonetheless, I admit being impressed by both schools. I think undergraduates can receive an excellent education at
either. So which do you prefer—trees or
bears?